Rationale for Utilization of Hydrogel Rectal Spacers in Dose Escalated SBRT for the Treatment of Unfavorable Risk Prostate Cancer.

In this review we outline the current evidence for the use of hydrogel rectal spacers in the treatment paradigm for prostate cancer with external beam radiation therapy. We review their development, summarize clinical evidence, risk of adverse events, best practices for placement, treatment planning considerations and finally we outline a framework and rationale for the utilization of rectal spacers when treating unfavorable risk prostate cancer with dose escalated Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT).

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for Prostate Cancer in Men With a High Baseline International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS ≥ 15).

Background: Patients with a high pretreatment IPSS may have higher rates of late urinary morbidity after radiation therapy for prostate cancer (1). Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) delivers fewer high-dose fractions of radiation, which may be radiobiologically favorable to the conventional low-dose external beam fractions. The urinary toxicity associated with SBRT, however, remains unclear in patients with a high IPSS (1). We report our experience using SBRT for localized prostate cancer in patients with pretreatment IPSS ≥ 15. Methods: Localized prostate cancer patients with a pre-treatment IPSS ≥ 15 treated with SBRT at Georgetown University Hospital from 2009 to 2016 were included in this retrospective review of prospectively collected data. These patients were treated to 35-36.25 Gy in five fractions delivered via CyberKnife (Accuray Inc., Sunnyvale, CA). Urinary toxicity was assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 (CTCAE v4). Urinary quality of life was assessed using validated questionnaires (IPSS and EPIC-26). Results: 53 patients at a median age of 71 years (range 57-89 years) received SBRT with a minimum follow up of 3 years. The median prostate size was 37 cm3 (range 12-100 cm3) and 30.2% patients received ADT. The 3-years incidence rate of Grade 3 urinary toxicity was 7.5% with median time to toxicity of 2.9 years. There were no Grade 4 or 5 toxicities. A mean baseline IPSS score of 19.8 significantly decreased to 12.9 at 3 months post-SBRT (p = 0.002) and remained stable at 36 months (13.7). A mean baseline EPIC-26 obstructive/irritative score of 64.1 significantly improved to 80.2 at 3 months (p = 0.002). This improvement was maintained to 36 months. There was no significant change from the mean baseline EPIC-26 urinary incontinence score at any point during follow up. Conclusions: SBRT for clinically localized prostate cancer was well-tolerated in men with baseline IPSS ≥ 15 (1). Grade 3 toxicities occurred but resolved with time. Our data suggest that poor baseline urinary function does not worsen following SBRT and may even improve. High baseline IPSS score should not be considered a contraindication to SBRT.

Urinary Morbidity in Men Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for Localized Prostate Cancer Following Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP).

Background: Clinical data suggest that stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) provides similar clinical outcomes as other radiation modalities for prostate cancer. However, data reporting on the safety of SBRT after TURP is limited. Herein, we report our experience using SBRT to deliver hypofractionated radiotherapy in patients with a history of TURP including physician-reported toxicities and patient-reported quality of life. Methods: Forty-seven patients treated with SBRT from 2007 to 2016 at Georgetown University Hospital for localized prostate carcinoma with a history of prior TURP were included in this retrospective analysis. Treatment was delivered using the CyberKnife® (Accuray Incorporated, Sunnyvale, CA) with doses of 35 Gy or 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions without prostatic urethral sparing. Toxicities were recorded and scored using the CTCAE v.4. Cystoscopy findings were retrospectively reviewed. Urinary quality of life data was assessed using the International Prostate Symptom Scoring (IPSS) and Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite 26 (EPIC-26). A Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test was used to determine if there was a statistically significant increase or decrease in IPSS or EPIC scores between timepoints. Minimally important differences were calculated by obtaining half the standard deviation at time of start of treatment. Results: Forty-seven patients at a median age of 72 years (range 63-84) received SBRT. The mean follow-up was 4.7 years (range 2-10 years). Late Grade 2 and grade 3 urinary toxicity occurred in 23 (48.9%) and 3 (6.4%) men, respectively. There were no Grade 4 or 5 toxicities. Approximately 51% of patients experienced hematuria following treatment. Mean time to hematuria was 10.5 months. Twenty-five cystoscopies were performed during follow-up and the most common finding was hyperemia, varices of the bladder neck/TURP defect, and/or necrotic tissue in the TURP defect. Baseline urinary QOL composite scores were low, but they did not clinically significantly decline in the first 2 years following treatment. Conclusions: In patients with prior TURP, prostate SBRT was well-tolerated. GU toxicity rates were comparable to similar patients treated with conventionally fractionated radiation therapy. Urinary quality of life was poor at baseline, but did not worsen clinically over time. Stricter dosimetric criteria could potentially improve the rate of high-grade late toxicity, but may increase the risk of peri-urethral recurrence.

Definitive hypofractionated radiation therapy for early stage breast cancer: Dosimetric feasibility of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy and proton beam therapy for intact breast tumors.

PURPOSE: Few definitive treatment options exist for elderly patients diagnosed with early stage breast cancer who are medically inoperable or refuse surgery. Historical data suggest very poor local control with hormone therapy alone. We examined the dosimetric feasibility of hypofractionated radiation therapy using stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) and proton beam therapy (PBT) as a means of definitive treatment for early stage breast cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifteen patients with biopsy-proven early stage breast cancer with a clinically visible tumor on preoperative computed tomography scans were identified. Gross tumor volumes were contoured and correlated with known biopsy-proven malignancy on prior imaging. Treatment margins were created on the basis of set-up uncertainty and image guidance capabilities of the three radiation modalities analyzed (3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy [3D-CRT], SABR, and PBT) to deliver a total dose of 50 Gy in 5 fractions. Dose volume histograms were analyzed and compared between treatment techniques. RESULTS: The median planning target volume (PTV) for SABR, PBT, and 3-dimensional CRT was 11.91, 21.03, and 45.08 cm3, respectively, and were significantly different (P < .0001) between treatment modalities. Overall target coverage of gross tumor and clinical target volumes was excellent with all three modalities. Both SABR and PBT demonstrated significant dosimetric improvements, each in its own unique manner, relative to 3D-CRT. Dose constraints to normal structures including ipsilateral/contralateral breast, bilateral lungs, and heart were all consistently achieved using SABR and PBT. However, skin or chest wall dose constraints were exceeded in some cases for both SABR and PBT plans and was dictated by the anatomic location of the tumor. CONCLUSIONS: Definitive hypofractionated radiation therapy using SABR and PBT appears to be dosimetrically feasible for the treatment of early stage breast cancer. The anatomical location of the tumor relative to the skin and chest wall appears to be the primary limiting dosimetric factor.

Five-fraction SBRT for ultra-central NSCLC in-field recurrences following high-dose conventional radiation.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: Local treatment options for patients with in-field non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) recurrence following conventionally fractionated external beam radiation therapy (CF-EBRT) are limited. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a promising modality to achieve reasonable local control, although toxicity remains a concern. MATERIALS/METHODS: Patients previously treated with high-dose CF-EBRT (≥59.4 Gy, ≤3 Gy/fraction) for non-metastatic NSCLC who underwent salvage SBRT for localized ultra-central in-field recurrence were included in this analysis. Ultra-central recurrences were defined as those abutting the trachea, mainstem bronchus, or esophagus and included both parenchymal and nodal recurrences. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate local control and overall survival. Durable local control was defined as ≥12 months. Toxicity was scored per the CTC-AE v4.0. RESULTS: Twenty patients were treated with five-fraction robotic SBRT for ultra-central in-field recurrence following CF-EBRT. Fifty percent of recurrences were adenocarcinoma, while 35% of tumors were classified as squamous cell carcinoma. The median interval between the end of CF-EBRT and SBRT was 23.3 months (range: 2.6 - 93.6 months). The median CF-EBRT dose was 63 Gy (range: 59.4 - 75 Gy), the median SBRT dose was 35 Gy (range: 25 - 45 Gy), and the median total equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) was 116 Gy (range: 91.3 - 136.7 Gy). At a median follow-up of 12 months for all patients and 37.5 months in surviving patients, the majority of patients (90%) have died. High-dose SBRT was associated with improved local control (p < .01), and the one-year overall survival and local control were 77.8% and 66.7% respectively in this sub-group. No late esophageal toxicity was noted, although a patient who received an SBRT dose of 45 Gy (total EQD2: 129.7 Gy) experienced grade 5 hemoptysis 35 months following treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Although the overall prognosis for patients with in-field ultra-central NSCLC recurrences following CF-EBRT remains grim, five-fraction SBRT was well tolerated with an acceptable toxicity profile. Dose escalation above 35 Gy may offer improved local control, however caution is warranted when treating high-risk recurrences with aggressive regimens.

Prostate-Specific Antigen 5 Years following Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Low- and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: An Ablative Procedure?

BACKGROUND: Our previous work on early PSA kinetics following prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) demonstrated that an initial rapid and then slow PSA decline may result in very low PSA nadirs. This retrospective study sought to evaluate the PSA nadir 5 years following SBRT for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS: 65 low- and 80 intermediate-risk PCa patients were treated definitively with SBRT to 35-37.5 Gy in 5 fractions at Georgetown University Hospital between January 2008 and October 2011. Patients who received androgen deprivation therapy were excluded from this study. Biochemical relapse was defined as a PSA rise >2 ng/ml above the nadir and analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The PSA nadir was defined as the lowest PSA value prior to biochemical relapse or as the lowest value recorded during follow-up. Prostate ablation was defined as a PSA nadir <0.2 ng/ml. Univariate logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate relevant variables on the likelihood of achieving a PSA nadir <0.2 ng/ml. RESULTS: The median age at the start of SBRT was 72 years. These patients had a median prostate volume of 36 cc with a median 25% of total cores involved. At a median follow-up of 5.6 years, 86 and 37% of patients achieved a PSA nadir ≤0.5 and <0.2 ng/ml, respectively. The median time to PSA nadir was 36 months. Two low and seven intermediate risk patients experienced a biochemical relapse. Regardless of the PSA outcome, the median PSA nadir for all patients was 0.2 ng/ml. The 5-year biochemical relapse free survival (bRFS) rate for low- and intermediate-risk patients was 98.5 and 95%, respectively. Initial PSA (p = 0.024) and a lower testosterone at the time of the PSA nadir (p = 0.049) were found to be significant predictors of achieving a PSA nadir <0.2 ng/ml. CONCLUSION: SBRT for low- and intermediate-risk PCa is a convenient treatment option with low PSA nadirs and a high rate of early bRFS. Fewer than 40% of patients, however, achieved an ablative PSA nadir. Thus, the role of further dose escalation is an area of active investigation.

Long-term outcomes of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with fiducial tracking for inoperable stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is considered standard of care in the medically inoperable patient population. Multiple methods of SBRT delivery exist including fiducial-based tumor tracking, which allows for smaller treatment margins and avoidance of patient immobilization devices. We explore the long-term clinical outcomes of this novel fiducial-based SBRT method. METHODS: In this single institutional retrospective review, we detail the outcomes of medically inoperable pathologically confirmed stage I NSCLC. Patients were treated with the Cyberknife SBRT system using a planning target volume (PTV) defined as a 5-mm expansion from gross tumor volume (GTV) without creation of an internal target volume (ITV). Dose was delivered in three or five equal fractions of 10 to 20 Gy. Pretreatment and posttreatment pulmonary function test (PFT) changes and evidence of late radiological rib fractures were analyzed for the majority of patients. Actuarial local control, locoregional control, distant control, and overall survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients with a median age of 75 years were available for analysis. The majority (80 %) of patients were deemed to be medically inoperable due to underlying pulmonary dysfunction. Eleven patients (18 %) developed symptomatic pneumothoraces secondary to fiducial placement under CT guidance, which precipitously dropped to 0 % following transition to bronchoscopic fiducial placement. The 2-year rib fracture risk was 21.4 % with a median time to rib fracture of 2.9 years. PFTs averaged over all patients and parameters demonstrated small absolute declines, 5.7 % averaged PFT decline, at approximately 1 year of follow-up, but only the diffusing capacity of lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) demonstrated a statistically significant decline (10.29 vs. 9.01 mL/min/mmHg, p = 0.01). Five-year local control, locoregional control, and overall survival were 87.6, 71.8, and 39.3 %, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Despite reduced treatment margins and lack of patient immobilization, SBRT with fiducial-based tumor tracking achieves clinically comparable long-term outcomes to other linac-based SBRT approaches.